MPWR vs VICR: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?
Last updated August 2026
Short answer
MPWR is the larger of the two ($70.06B market cap): the incumbent the market prices for continued execution (40.98x forward earnings, beta 1.71). VICR is the smaller challenger ($9.56B), priced similarly on forward earnings (37.34x): more room to run, but more to prove. The real question is which set of drivers you believe, and whether owning one (or both) leaves you over-concentrated.
MPWR vs VICR: the tie-breaker metrics
Same yardstick, side by side (as of August 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.
| Metric | MPWR | VICR | What it tells you |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $70.06B | $9.56B | Size. The larger name is the incumbent; the smaller has more room to grow and more to prove. |
| Forward P/E | 40.98 | 37.34 | Valuation on next year's expected earnings, the same yardstick for both. Lower is cheaper for that growth; higher means the market is paying up. |
| Trailing P/E | 86.95 | 66.25 | Valuation on the last 12 months. A big drop from trailing to forward means the market expects earnings to jump, so more growth is already in the price. |
| Beta | 1.71 | 2.34 | Volatility vs the market. Above 1 swings harder than the index; below 1 is steadier. Higher beta means bigger drawdowns to hold through. |
| Price vs 52-week range | 69% of range | 48% of range | Where today's price sits between the 52-week low and high. Near the high is momentum with less margin of safety; near the low is out of favor or a discount, depending on why. |
| Price / book | 19.05 | 11.42 | How much you pay over book value. Very high can signal an asset-light, high-return business or a rich price. |
Before you buy: how MPWR and VICR affect your concentration
The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. MPWR and VICR share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.
This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined MPWR and VICR exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.
What does Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) do?
Monolithic Power Systems is a Kirkland, Washington based fabless semiconductor company that designs power-management and analog integrated circuits. Its proprietary BCD (bipolar-CMOS-DMOS) process integrates analog, digital, and memory functions onto a single chip, which lets it build compact, high-efficiency power modules used across enterprise data and AI servers, automotive, computing and storage, communications, industrial, and consumer end markets. The company outsources manufacturing and focuses on design, and its integrated power modules have become a reference standard as AI GPU clusters push toward extreme power densities.
What does Vicor Corporation (VICR) do?
Vicor Corporation designs, manufactures, and sells modular power components and complete power systems that convert electrical power efficiently for electronic devices. Headquartered in Andover, Massachusetts, it builds converters, power modules, and integrated circuits using patented high-frequency switching and its Factorized Power Architecture, which lets its parts be smaller and more efficient than conventional alternatives. Its products go into high-performance computing and AI accelerators, data centers, aerospace and defense, industrial equipment, and automotive, with recent focus on delivering the last inch of power to power-hungry AI chips through products like its NBM bus converters and vertical power delivery (VPD) modules.
MPWR vs VICR: how do they differ?
Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.
- MPWR drivers: AI data-center power demand; Diversified end markets.
- VICR drivers: AI data-center power demand; Vertical fabrication ramp and margins.
Which fits which kind of investor
A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: The most visible risk is valuation: a market cap near $70 billion on roughly $2.9 billion of trailing revenue leaves little margin for error, so any growth disappointment can trigger sharp drawdowns. For VICR, vicor faces intense competition from far larger power-semiconductor companies, including Monolithic Power Systems, Texas Instruments, Analog Devices, Infineon, Renesas, and Delta Electronics, and it notably lost socket share on some Nvidia GPU platforms to lower-cost integrated rivals.
MPWR or VICR: which should you pick?
Growth-minded investors who believe the theme has years to run tend to accept the richer multiple for more upside; value-minded investors lean toward the cheaper forward earnings and steadier profile. Pick MPWR if you believe its drivers more; VICR if you believe its. Many investors hold both, but since they share themes, that is a concentrated bet, not diversification. Decide deliberately and check overlap. For the full detail, see the MPWR and VICR guides.
MPWR vs VICR: the full fundamentals
MPWR. MPWR trades at a steep premium to the broader semiconductor group, reflecting its growth rate and AI exposure rather than current earnings. Gross margin has held near 55 percent, and the balance sheet is largely debt-free. The gap between the trailing multiple near 100x and the forward multiple near 50x underscores how much future earnings growth is embedded in the price.
VICR. Full-year 2025 total revenue reached about $452.7 million, but that includes a roughly $45 million one-time patent-litigation settlement, so the cleaner operating figure is product revenue near $350.3 million plus about $57.4 million of royalties. Cash and equivalents stood near $402.8 million with no meaningful debt. The stock re-rated sharply higher on the AI power theme, pushing its earnings multiple well above semiconductor-sector averages.
Headline figures (approximate, JULY 2026): MPWR shows revenue (ttm) ~$2.9B, fy2025 revenue ~$2.79B (+26% YoY), q1 2026 revenue ~$804M (+26% YoY, record), market cap ~$70B; VICR shows total revenue (fy2025) ~$452.7 million (incl. ~$45M patent settlement), product revenue (fy2025) ~$350.3 million (up ~12%), net income (fy2025) ~$118.6 million, diluted eps (fy2025) ~$2.61.
The bottom line: MPWR vs VICR
MPWR and VICR are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined MPWR and VICR exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.
Wondering how MPWR or VICR fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.
Investing in Monolithic Power Systems with AI
Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how MPWR fits what you actually hold: whether you own it already through a fund, what it would do to your concentration, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.
FAQ
What is the difference between MPWR and VICR?
+
Monolithic Power Systems is a Kirkland, Washington based fabless semiconductor company that designs power-management and analog integrated circuits. Vicor Corporation designs, manufactures, and sells modular power components and complete power systems that convert electrical power efficiently for electronic devices. They show up together because they share investment themes, but they are different businesses, so the better fit depends on which thesis you are expressing.
Is MPWR or VICR the better stock?
+
Neither is universally better. MPWR is the larger incumbent; VICR is the smaller challenger and looks cheaper on forward earnings. Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Compare what each does, the tie-breaker metrics above, and the risks, then decide which fits your thesis and what you already own.
Which is cheaper, MPWR or VICR?
+
On forward P/E (as of August 2026), MPWR trades at 40.98x and VICR at 37.34x, so VICR is the cheaper of the two on next year's expected earnings. A lower multiple is not automatically the better buy: a richer valuation can be justified by faster growth, and a lower one can reflect real risk. Weigh the multiple against how fast each business is compounding.
Should you own both MPWR and VICR?
+
Because they share themes, owning both concentrates you in that theme. That can be intentional (a focused bet) or accidental (less diversification than it looks). Walnut can show your combined exposure across both, and whether adding either over-concentrates you, before you buy.
What are the risks of MPWR vs VICR?
+
MPWR: The most visible risk is valuation: a market cap near $70 billion on roughly $2.9 billion of trailing revenue leaves little margin for error, so any growth disappointment can trigger sharp drawdowns. Heavy reliance on AI-related enterprise data spending means a slowdown in hyperscaler capital expenditure would hit results directly. Customer concentration among a few large chip and system makers adds vulnerability if a design socket is lost. Semiconductor demand is cyclical, and automotive or industrial softness could offset AI strength. Competition from much larger analog rivals and pricing pressure remain persistent structural threats. VICR: Vicor faces intense competition from far larger power-semiconductor companies, including Monolithic Power Systems, Texas Instruments, Analog Devices, Infineon, Renesas, and Delta Electronics, and it notably lost socket share on some Nvidia GPU platforms to lower-cost integrated rivals. Its business is concentrated and cyclical: results depend heavily on a handful of large customers and on the AI and industrial capital-spending cycle, so orders can swing sharply. The stock trades at a high price-to-earnings multiple (roughly 90 to 110 times earnings in mid-2026), which leaves little room for disappointment and can produce large drawdowns if growth slows. Royalty and one-time settlement income can flatter reported results, and a published short thesis argues AI-chip design trends could erode Vicor's competitive position over time.
Walnut is informational, not investment advice. This page is descriptive and not a recommendation to buy or sell MPWR or VICR; figures are approximate and dated (as of August 2026). Verify current data before investing.