PI vs ZBRA: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

Last updated August 2026

Short answer

ZBRA is the larger of the two ($14.00B market cap): the incumbent the market prices for continued execution (14.18x forward earnings, beta 1.61). PI is the smaller challenger ($4.62B), actually pricier on forward earnings (53.88x): more room to run, but more to prove. The real question is which set of drivers you believe, and whether owning one (or both) leaves you over-concentrated.

PI vs ZBRA: the tie-breaker metrics

Same yardstick, side by side (as of August 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.

MetricPIZBRAWhat it tells you
Market cap$4.62B$14.00BSize. The larger name is the incumbent; the smaller has more room to grow and more to prove.
Forward P/E53.8814.18Valuation on next year's expected earnings, the same yardstick for both. Lower is cheaper for that growth; higher means the market is paying up.
Beta1.921.61Volatility vs the market. Above 1 swings harder than the index; below 1 is steadier. Higher beta means bigger drawdowns to hold through.
Price vs 52-week range40% of range63% of rangeWhere today's price sits between the 52-week low and high. Near the high is momentum with less margin of safety; near the low is out of favor or a discount, depending on why.
Price / book22.614.10How much you pay over book value. Very high can signal an asset-light, high-return business or a rich price.

Reading it: ZBRA is the cheaper of the two on forward earnings, but cheaper is not the same as better. Pair the valuation with growth (how far the forward P/E sits below the trailing P/E) and risk (beta) before you decide.

Before you buy: how PI and ZBRA affect your concentration

The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. PI and ZBRA share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.

This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined PI and ZBRA exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.

What does Impinj (PI) do?

Impinj is a Seattle-based semiconductor and software company that builds the core technology for RAIN RFID, the ultra-high-frequency wireless standard used to identify and locate individual physical items. Its platform has two main parts: tiny endpoint ICs (the chips embedded in RFID tags and inlays that go on apparel, parcels, food, and other goods, shipped in the tens of billions per year) and systems products (reader ICs, readers, and gateways that power the antennas which read those tags), plus connectivity software. Partners like Avery Dennison turn Impinj's chips into the inlays and labels that brands actually apply, while reader makers like Zebra Technologies build hardware around Impinj silicon. The company frames its opportunity as enormous: RAIN connected roughly 52 billion items in 2024, which it estimates is only about 0.5% of all connectable items worldwide.

Full PI guide

What does Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) do?

Zebra Technologies makes the barcode scanners, mobile computers, RFID systems and label printers used to track inventory and workers across warehouses, retail stores and hospitals.

Full ZBRA guide

PI vs ZBRA: how do they differ?

Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.

  • PI drivers: Item-level RFID adoption; M800 ramp and Gen2X differentiation.
  • ZBRA drivers: Warehouse and logistics automation; RFID adoption in retail.

Which fits which kind of investor

A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: The dominant risk is customer concentration and lumpy demand: a handful of large inlay partners and end customers drive most volume, so an inventory drawdown at one of them can flatten revenue for several quarters, as roughly flat Q1 2026 sales showed. For ZBRA, demand is capital-spending driven and was heavily pulled forward during the e-commerce surge, which led to a sharp subsequent slowdown.

PI or ZBRA: which should you pick?

Growth-minded investors who believe the theme has years to run tend to accept the richer multiple for more upside; value-minded investors lean toward the cheaper forward earnings and steadier profile. Pick PI if you believe its drivers more; ZBRA if you believe its. Many investors hold both, but since they share themes, that is a concentrated bet, not diversification. Decide deliberately and check overlap. For the full detail, see the PI and ZBRA guides.

PI vs ZBRA: the full fundamentals

PI. Figures are approximate and tied to the asOf date; verify live numbers before acting. Impinj trades as a growth stock, so it is valued on a rich multiple of sales rather than earnings, which means the price is sensitive to revenue growth and guidance more than to any single quarter's profit. Analyst 12-month targets in mid-2026 sat well above the recent price (for example Susquehanna near $200 and Barclays near $169 after trims), reflecting optimism on RFID adoption that is a bet on the theme continuing to compound.

ZBRA. Zebra's results have been shaped by a demand pull-forward and the correction that followed, which makes multi-year comparisons more useful than single quarters. Verify current order trends and inventory levels in the channel.

Headline figures (approximate, July 2026): PI shows revenue (fy2025) ~$361 million (GAAP gross margin ~52.5%), revenue (q1 2026) ~$74 million (roughly flat year over year), q1 2026 profitability GAAP net loss ~$25 million (incl. an ~$11.9 million convertible-note charge); non-GAAP net income ~$4.4 million; adjusted EBITDA ~$3.4 million, q2 2026 guidance Revenue ~$103 million to ~$106 million; non-GAAP EPS ~$0.77 to ~$0.82; ZBRA shows business model Rugged scanning and mobile computing hardware plus software, end markets Warehousing and logistics, retail, healthcare, manufacturing, demand pattern Capital spending driven, with a pandemic pull-forward and correction, recurring element Replacement cycles on a large installed base.

The bottom line: PI vs ZBRA

PI and ZBRA are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined PI and ZBRA exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.

Wondering how PI or ZBRA fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.

Investing in Impinj with AI

Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how PI fits what you actually hold: whether you own it already through a fund, what it would do to your concentration, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.

FAQ

What is the difference between PI and ZBRA?

+

Impinj is a Seattle-based semiconductor and software company that builds the core technology for RAIN RFID, the ultra-high-frequency wireless standard used to identify and locate individual physical items. Zebra Technologies makes the barcode scanners, mobile computers, RFID systems and label printers used to track inventory and workers across warehouses, retail stores and hospitals. They show up together because they share investment themes, but they are different businesses, so the better fit depends on which thesis you are expressing.

Is PI or ZBRA the better stock?

+

Neither is universally better. ZBRA is the larger incumbent; PI is the smaller challenger and looks pricier on forward earnings. Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Compare what each does, the tie-breaker metrics above, and the risks, then decide which fits your thesis and what you already own.

Which is cheaper, PI or ZBRA?

+

On forward P/E (as of August 2026), PI trades at 53.88x and ZBRA at 14.18x, so ZBRA is the cheaper of the two on next year's expected earnings. A lower multiple is not automatically the better buy: a richer valuation can be justified by faster growth, and a lower one can reflect real risk. Weigh the multiple against how fast each business is compounding.

Should you own both PI and ZBRA?

+

Because they share themes, owning both concentrates you in that theme. That can be intentional (a focused bet) or accidental (less diversification than it looks). Walnut can show your combined exposure across both, and whether adding either over-concentrates you, before you buy.

What are the risks of PI vs ZBRA?

+

PI: The dominant risk is customer concentration and lumpy demand: a handful of large inlay partners and end customers drive most volume, so an inventory drawdown at one of them can flatten revenue for several quarters, as roughly flat Q1 2026 sales showed. Valuation is a second risk, with the stock trading at a high multiple of sales (around 11x) and no trailing GAAP profit, which leaves little cushion if growth stalls or a quarter disappoints. Competition from NXP Semiconductors in endpoint silicon and from other RFID and tracking technologies could pressure pricing and share. The company also carries convertible debt, which introduced an $11.9 million induced-conversion charge in Q1 2026 and can dilute or complicate the capital structure. Finally, adoption of item-level RFID depends on customer capital spending and macro conditions that Impinj does not control. ZBRA: Demand is capital-spending driven and was heavily pulled forward during the e-commerce surge, which led to a sharp subsequent slowdown. Retail and logistics customers cut equipment budgets quickly when their own demand softens. Competition is intense in scanning and printing hardware, and smartphone-based scanning erodes the low end of the market.

Related comparisons

Browse all stock comparisons.

Walnut is informational, not investment advice. This page is descriptive and not a recommendation to buy or sell PI or ZBRA; figures are approximate and dated (as of August 2026). Verify current data before investing.

    PI vs ZBRA: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? - Walnut AI Investing App