Empower vs Facet: Which Is Better in 2026?

Last updated November 2026

Short answer

Empower is a robo-advisor (hands-off automated investing); Facet is a robo-advisor (hands-off automated investing). Best for free portfolio tracking; the paid advice is a separate decision: Empower (0.89%/yr from $100,000, tiered down to 0.49% (Oct 2026)). Best for flat-fee financial planning with a dedicated CFP: Facet ($2,600, $5,500 or $8,700/yr flat, no asset minimum (Oct 2026)). Best for a keep, trim or exit read on the stocks you already own, with the trades you approve placed for you: Walnut, an AI investing app (free; Walnut Plus $9.99/mo on the web; no fee on assets).

Both Empower and Facet get grouped under “AI investing tools,” which is why people compare them. Below is what each one does, whether it reads the brokerage you already use, how each is priced, and who each fits, checked in October 2026. Walnut, which publishes this page, is an AI investing app and is noted where it fits.

Empower vs Facet at a glance

 EmpowerFacet
CategoryHands-off automated investing (robo-advisors)Hands-off automated investing (robo-advisors)
What the AI doesAggregates accounts and analyses themNone; this is human planning
Connects your brokerYes, for tracking (aggregates held-away accounts)No (manages assets it custodies, planning covers the rest)
Read vs tradeOnly in accounts it managesAdvisor-managed
Cost0.89%/yr from $100,000, tiered down to 0.49% (Oct 2026)$2,600, $5,500 or $8,700/yr flat, no asset minimum (Oct 2026)
Best forFree portfolio tracking; the paid advice is a separate decisionFlat-fee financial planning with a dedicated CFP
One limitationThe free tools are a lead source for a high-fee managed service, and the sales contact is persistent.The flat fee is large in absolute terms at small balances, so it only beats a percentage once you have enough assets or enough complexity.

Prices checked October 2026. A price marked (Oct 2026) was read on the vendor's own pricing page; others are described without a number because we could not verify one.

What is Empower?

Free account aggregation and portfolio analysis tools, alongside a percentage-fee wealth management service for larger balances.

How it works: You link accounts from across providers and Empower shows net worth, allocation, and a fee analyser that surfaces expense ratios you may not have noticed. That tier is free. Separately, Empower runs a managed wealth service with human advisors at a percentage of assets, with minimums, and the free tools are the funnel into it.

In practice, Empower’s AI aggregates accounts and analyses them. It is a robo-advisor (hands-off automated investing), best suited to free portfolio tracking; the paid advice is a separate decision. On connecting an account: yes, for tracking (aggregates held-away accounts). On execution: only in accounts it manages. Cost: 0.89%/yr from $100,000, tiered down to 0.49% (Oct 2026).

One real limitation: The free tools are a lead source for a high-fee managed service, and the sales contact is persistent.

What is Facet?

Flat-fee financial planning with a dedicated CFP professional, priced by complexity.

How it works: You pay an annual membership and are assigned a CFP professional who covers planning across tax, insurance, estate coordination and retirement, with investment management available inside it. Because the fee is flat and set by complexity, it does not rise as your portfolio grows, and that is its main argument against the percentage model.

In practice, Facet’s AI none; this is human planning. It is a robo-advisor (hands-off automated investing), best suited to flat-fee financial planning with a dedicated CFP. On connecting an account: no (manages assets it custodies, planning covers the rest). On execution: advisor-managed. Cost: $2,600, $5,500 or $8,700/yr flat, no asset minimum (Oct 2026).

One real limitation: The flat fee is large in absolute terms at small balances, so it only beats a percentage once you have enough assets or enough complexity.

Empower vs Facet: how they actually differ

Category comes first. Empower focuses on free portfolio tracking; the paid advice is a separate decision (aggregates accounts and analyses them), and Facet on flat-fee financial planning with a dedicated CFP (none; this is human planning). On broker connection they differ too: Empower is “Yes, for tracking (aggregates held-away accounts)” versus Facet at “No (manages assets it custodies, planning covers the rest)”. That shapes everything downstream: how personal the answers are, where trades settle, and how much control you keep over individual positions.

Empower vs Facet: strengths and trade-offs

Every tool gives something up for what it does well. Below is the give-and-take on each, so you can weigh the specific strengths against the limitations that come with them, beyond the headline category.

Empower

Where it is strong

  • Genuinely useful free aggregation across accounts no single provider sees
  • The fee analyser routinely surfaces fund costs people did not know they were paying
  • Managed tier adds access to human advisors on top of the software

What to watch out for

  • Expect sales contact after linking accounts. The free product exists to source clients for the managed one
  • The managed service is priced at the higher end of the market for what is largely ETF portfolio management

Facet

Where it is strong

  • A flat fee that does not grow with your balance, which removes the incentive against advice that shrinks it
  • A dedicated CFP professional of your own; there is no call centre or questionnaire
  • Planning breadth beyond investing, including tax and insurance coordination

What to watch out for

  • In absolute dollars the membership is significant, so at smaller balances a percentage fee is cheaper
  • Pricing tiers by complexity, so confirm which tier your situation lands in before comparing

The key divider: does it read your real holdings?

For AI investing tools, the distinction that matters most is whether the tool works from your actual, connected positions or reasons from something else: a separate account it manages for you, or the tickers and numbers you feed it. It decides how personal the answers can be, and where your money physically lives.

  • Empower: reads your real connected holdings. Empower connects your real brokerage (Yes, for tracking (aggregates held-away accounts)) and works from your actual positions, so its answers reflect what you actually own.
  • Facet: manages a separate account it holds. Facet does not read the brokerage you already use. It opens and holds a new account, then invests the money you move into it, so its view is limited to what sits inside Facet.

This is where they diverge most. One works from your real, connected account while the other does not, so if you want an assistant grounded in the exact positions you already hold, that gap is the thing to weigh first. This holdings-aware angle is the one Walnut is built around: it connects the brokerage you already use and reasons from your live positions, read-only by default, with any trades left for you to approve.

Empower vs Facet: which should you choose?

Each one wins a different job, so the answer depends on which job you need done.

  • Choose Empower if you want free portfolio tracking; the paid advice is a separate decision. Its AI aggregates accounts and analyses them, and it costs 0.89%/yr from $100,000, tiered down to 0.49% (Oct 2026). It is built for someone who wants a free, honest view of accounts spread across providers and is comfortable declining the follow-up call. Keep in mind: the free tools are a lead source for a high-fee managed service, and the sales contact is persistent.
  • Choose Facet if you want flat-fee financial planning with a dedicated CFP. Its AI none; this is human planning, and it costs $2,600, $5,500 or $8,700/yr flat, no asset minimum (Oct 2026). It is built for someone with a few hundred thousand or more, or real complexity, who wants planning more than portfolio management and objects to paying a percentage. Keep in mind: the flat fee is large in absolute terms at small balances, so it only beats a percentage once you have enough assets or enough complexity.
  • Choose Walnut if you want a keep, trim or exit read on the stocks you already own, and placing the trades you approve. It is an AI investing app that connects the broker you already use, and it costs free; Walnut Plus $9.99/mo on the web; no fee on assets.

Because both sit in the same category, the choice comes down to the finer details above. Their basic approach is the same.

Empower vs Facet: pricing and cost model

Cost is easy to misread when two tools charge in different shapes, so compare the model, not just the number. Empower: 0.89%/yr from $100,000, tiered down to 0.49% (Oct 2026). Facet: $2,600, $5,500 or $8,700/yr flat, no asset minimum (Oct 2026). A percentage-of-assets fee scales with your balance, a flat subscription does not, and a “free” tier usually earns elsewhere (on cash, order flow, or premium upgrades), so the cheapest headline is not always the cheapest outcome for your situation.

Prices checked October 2026. Pricing and tiers change, so confirm the current numbers on each provider’s own site before you decide.

Where Walnut fits

Walnut is an AI investing app, and it is the pick for a keep, trim or exit read on the stocks you already own, and placing the trades you approve (free; Walnut Plus $9.99/mo on the web; no fee on assets). It connects the brokerage you already use, read-only by default, gives each holding a keep, trim or exit read against the S&P 500, flags any position above a quarter of the portfolio, and places the trades you approve. You use it through its own assistant, or inside Claude or ChatGPT. See Walnut vs Empower and Walnut vs Facet.

Try Walnut on top of your broker

Free. Connect the broker you already use, and ask anything about what you own.

FAQ

Is Empower or Facet better?

+

Empower is better for free portfolio tracking; the paid advice is a separate decision (0.89%/yr from $100,000, tiered down to 0.49% (Oct 2026)). Facet is better for flat-fee financial planning with a dedicated CFP ($2,600, $5,500 or $8,700/yr flat, no asset minimum (Oct 2026)). Empower is a robo-advisor (hands-off automated investing) and Facet is a robo-advisor (hands-off automated investing), so the right pick is the one whose job you want done.

What is the difference between Empower and Facet?

+

Empower is a robo-advisor (hands-off automated investing): it aggregates accounts and analyses them. Facet is a robo-advisor (hands-off automated investing): it none; this is human planning. Empower suits free portfolio tracking; the paid advice is a separate decision; Facet suits flat-fee financial planning with a dedicated CFP.

Is Empower or Facet better for beginners?

+

Empower is the more beginner-friendly of the two (free portfolio tracking; the paid advice is a separate decision). The other is better once you know what you want from it. Neither replaces understanding what you own.

Does Empower connect to my brokerage?

+

Empower: yes, for tracking (aggregates held-away accounts) (reads your real connected holdings). Facet: no (manages assets it custodies, planning covers the rest) (manages a separate account it holds). If keeping your current broker matters, that distinction is often the deciding factor.

Does Empower see my real holdings?

+

Empower connects your real brokerage (Yes, for tracking (aggregates held-away accounts)) and works from your actual positions, so its answers reflect what you actually own. By contrast, Facet manages a separate account it holds: Facet does not read the brokerage you already use. It opens and holds a new account, then invests the money you move into it, so its view is limited to what sits inside Facet.

Empower vs Facet: which is cheaper?

+

Empower: 0.89%/yr from $100,000, tiered down to 0.49% (Oct 2026). Facet: $2,600, $5,500 or $8,700/yr flat, no asset minimum (Oct 2026). A percentage of assets grows with your balance and a flat subscription does not, so compare in dollars at your balance. Prices marked (Oct 2026) were checked on the vendor's own site in October 2026.

Can I use Empower and Facet together?

+

Often yes, because they do different things: one for free portfolio tracking; the paid advice is a separate decision and the other for flat-fee financial planning with a dedicated CFP. Watch for overlapping subscription costs, and remember that trades settle in whatever account actually holds your money.

Who is Empower best for, and who is Facet best for?

+

Empower best fits someone who wants a free, honest view of accounts spread across providers and is comfortable declining the follow-up call. Facet best fits someone with a few hundred thousand or more, or real complexity, who wants planning more than portfolio management and objects to paying a percentage. If you see yourself in one description more than the other, that is usually the clearer signal than any single feature or price.

What are the main trade-offs between Empower and Facet?

+

With Empower, watch for this: expect sales contact after linking accounts. The free product exists to source clients for the managed one. With Facet: in absolute dollars the membership is significant, so at smaller balances a percentage fee is cheaper. Pick the trade-off you can live with given the job you want done.

Where does Walnut fit between Empower and Facet?

+

Walnut is an AI investing app, and it is the pick for a keep, trim or exit read on the stocks you already own, and placing the trades you approve (free; Walnut Plus $9.99/mo on the web; no fee on assets). It connects the brokerage you already use, read-only by default, gives each holding a keep, trim or exit read against the S&P 500, builds thematic baskets with target weights, and places the trades you approve. You use it through its own assistant, or inside Claude or ChatGPT.

Related comparisons

Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Competitor features and pricing are point-in-time and change; verify the current details on each provider's site before deciding. Nothing here is a recommendation to use any particular product or security.