Facet vs Fidelity Go: Which Is Better in 2026?
Last updated November 2026
Short answer
Facet is a robo-advisor (hands-off automated investing); Fidelity Go is a robo-advisor (hands-off automated investing). Best for flat-fee financial planning with a dedicated CFP: Facet ($2,600, $5,500 or $8,700/yr flat, no asset minimum (Oct 2026)). Best for small balances, where it is free: Fidelity Go ($0 under $25,000, then 0.35%/yr, no minimum to open (Oct 2026)). Best for a keep, trim or exit read on the stocks you already own, with the trades you approve placed for you: Walnut, an AI investing app (free; Walnut Plus $9.99/mo on the web; no fee on assets).
Both Facet and Fidelity Go get grouped under “AI investing tools,” which is why people compare them. Below is what each one does, whether it reads the brokerage you already use, how each is priced, and who each fits, checked in October 2026. Walnut, which publishes this page, is an AI investing app and is noted where it fits.
Facet vs Fidelity Go at a glance
| Facet | Fidelity Go | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Hands-off automated investing (robo-advisors) | Hands-off automated investing (robo-advisors) |
| What the AI does | None; this is human planning | Automates a Fidelity Flex fund portfolio |
| Connects your broker | No (manages assets it custodies, planning covers the rest) | No (holds your money at Fidelity) |
| Read vs trade | Advisor-managed | Automated |
| Cost | $2,600, $5,500 or $8,700/yr flat, no asset minimum (Oct 2026) | $0 under $25,000, then 0.35%/yr, no minimum to open (Oct 2026) |
| Best for | Flat-fee financial planning with a dedicated CFP | Small balances, where it is free |
| One limitation | The flat fee is large in absolute terms at small balances, so it only beats a percentage once you have enough assets or enough complexity. | No tax-loss harvesting, which removes the strongest argument for a managed taxable account. |
Prices checked October 2026. A price marked (Oct 2026) was read on the vendor's own pricing page; others are described without a number because we could not verify one.
What is Facet?
Flat-fee financial planning with a dedicated CFP professional, priced by complexity.
How it works: You pay an annual membership and are assigned a CFP professional who covers planning across tax, insurance, estate coordination and retirement, with investment management available inside it. Because the fee is flat and set by complexity, it does not rise as your portfolio grows, and that is its main argument against the percentage model.
In practice, Facet’s AI none; this is human planning. It is a robo-advisor (hands-off automated investing), best suited to flat-fee financial planning with a dedicated CFP. On connecting an account: no (manages assets it custodies, planning covers the rest). On execution: advisor-managed. Cost: $2,600, $5,500 or $8,700/yr flat, no asset minimum (Oct 2026).
One real limitation: The flat fee is large in absolute terms at small balances, so it only beats a percentage once you have enough assets or enough complexity.
What is Fidelity Go?
Fidelity's automated service, free below a stated balance and built from zero-expense-ratio Fidelity Flex funds. Best for people starting out.
How it works: A questionnaire sets the allocation, and Fidelity invests it in its own Flex mutual funds, which carry no expense ratio because Fidelity earns the advisory fee instead. Below a stated balance there is no advisory fee at all, which makes it one of the genuinely free ways to get a managed portfolio; above it, a flat percentage applies.
In practice, Fidelity Go’s AI automates a Fidelity Flex fund portfolio. It is a robo-advisor (hands-off automated investing), best suited to small balances, where it is free. On connecting an account: no (holds your money at Fidelity). On execution: automated. Cost: $0 under $25,000, then 0.35%/yr, no minimum to open (Oct 2026).
One real limitation: No tax-loss harvesting, which removes the strongest argument for a managed taxable account.
Facet vs Fidelity Go: how they actually differ
Category comes first. Facet focuses on flat-fee financial planning with a dedicated CFP (none; this is human planning), and Fidelity Go on small balances, where it is free (automates a Fidelity Flex fund portfolio). On broker connection they differ too: Facet is “No (manages assets it custodies, planning covers the rest)” versus Fidelity Go at “No (holds your money at Fidelity)”. That shapes everything downstream: how personal the answers are, where trades settle, and how much control you keep over individual positions.
Facet vs Fidelity Go: strengths and trade-offs
Every tool gives something up for what it does well. Below is the give-and-take on each, so you can weigh the specific strengths against the limitations that come with them, beyond the headline category.
Facet
Where it is strong
- A flat fee that does not grow with your balance, which removes the incentive against advice that shrinks it
- A dedicated CFP professional of your own; there is no call centre or questionnaire
- Planning breadth beyond investing, including tax and insurance coordination
What to watch out for
- In absolute dollars the membership is significant, so at smaller balances a percentage fee is cheaper
- Pricing tiers by complexity, so confirm which tier your situation lands in before comparing
Fidelity Go
Where it is strong
- Genuinely free below the stated balance threshold, with no underlying fund expenses
- Zero-expense-ratio Flex funds mean the advisory fee is the whole cost, which is unusually easy to compare
- Coaching calls are included above a higher balance tier
What to watch out for
- No tax-loss harvesting, so the main reason to pay for a managed taxable account is absent
- Flex funds are Fidelity-only and not portable, so leaving means selling
The key divider: does it read your real holdings?
For AI investing tools, the distinction that matters most is whether the tool works from your actual, connected positions or reasons from something else: a separate account it manages for you, or the tickers and numbers you feed it. It decides how personal the answers can be, and where your money physically lives.
- Facet: manages a separate account it holds. Facet does not read the brokerage you already use. It opens and holds a new account, then invests the money you move into it, so its view is limited to what sits inside Facet.
- Fidelity Go: manages a separate account it holds. Fidelity Go does not read the brokerage you already use. It opens and holds a new account, then invests the money you move into it, so its view is limited to what sits inside Fidelity Go.
On this specific question the two land on the same side, so the deciding factors between them are elsewhere: category, cost, and who each is built for. This holdings-aware angle is the one Walnut is built around: it connects the brokerage you already use and reasons from your live positions, read-only by default, with any trades left for you to approve.
Facet vs Fidelity Go: which should you choose?
Each one wins a different job, so the answer depends on which job you need done.
- Choose Facet if you want flat-fee financial planning with a dedicated CFP. Its AI none; this is human planning, and it costs $2,600, $5,500 or $8,700/yr flat, no asset minimum (Oct 2026). It is built for someone with a few hundred thousand or more, or real complexity, who wants planning more than portfolio management and objects to paying a percentage. Keep in mind: the flat fee is large in absolute terms at small balances, so it only beats a percentage once you have enough assets or enough complexity.
- Choose Fidelity Go if you want small balances, where it is free. Its AI automates a Fidelity Flex fund portfolio, and it costs $0 under $25,000, then 0.35%/yr, no minimum to open (Oct 2026). It is built for someone with a smaller balance who wants automation at no cost and holds it in a retirement account where harvesting would not apply anyway. Keep in mind: no tax-loss harvesting, which removes the strongest argument for a managed taxable account.
- Choose Walnut if you want a keep, trim or exit read on the stocks you already own, and placing the trades you approve. It is an AI investing app that connects the broker you already use, and it costs free; Walnut Plus $9.99/mo on the web; no fee on assets.
Because both sit in the same category, the choice comes down to the finer details above. Their basic approach is the same.
Facet vs Fidelity Go: pricing and cost model
Cost is easy to misread when two tools charge in different shapes, so compare the model, not just the number. Facet: $2,600, $5,500 or $8,700/yr flat, no asset minimum (Oct 2026). Fidelity Go: $0 under $25,000, then 0.35%/yr, no minimum to open (Oct 2026). A percentage-of-assets fee scales with your balance, a flat subscription does not, and a “free” tier usually earns elsewhere (on cash, order flow, or premium upgrades), so the cheapest headline is not always the cheapest outcome for your situation.
Prices checked October 2026. Pricing and tiers change, so confirm the current numbers on each provider’s own site before you decide.
Where Walnut fits
Walnut is an AI investing app, and it is the pick for a keep, trim or exit read on the stocks you already own, and placing the trades you approve (free; Walnut Plus $9.99/mo on the web; no fee on assets). It connects the brokerage you already use, read-only by default, gives each holding a keep, trim or exit read against the S&P 500, flags any position above a quarter of the portfolio, and places the trades you approve. You use it through its own assistant, or inside Claude or ChatGPT. See Walnut vs Facet and Walnut vs Fidelity Go.
Try Walnut on top of your broker
Free. Connect the broker you already use, and ask anything about what you own.
FAQ
Is Facet or Fidelity Go better?
+
Facet is better for flat-fee financial planning with a dedicated CFP ($2,600, $5,500 or $8,700/yr flat, no asset minimum (Oct 2026)). Fidelity Go is better for small balances, where it is free ($0 under $25,000, then 0.35%/yr, no minimum to open (Oct 2026)). Facet is a robo-advisor (hands-off automated investing) and Fidelity Go is a robo-advisor (hands-off automated investing), so the right pick is the one whose job you want done.
What is the difference between Facet and Fidelity Go?
+
Facet is a robo-advisor (hands-off automated investing): it none; this is human planning. Fidelity Go is a robo-advisor (hands-off automated investing): it automates a Fidelity Flex fund portfolio. Facet suits flat-fee financial planning with a dedicated CFP; Fidelity Go suits small balances, where it is free.
Is Facet or Fidelity Go better for beginners?
+
Facet is the more beginner-friendly of the two (flat-fee financial planning with a dedicated CFP). The other is better once you know what you want from it. Neither replaces understanding what you own.
Does Facet connect to my brokerage?
+
Facet: no (manages assets it custodies, planning covers the rest) (manages a separate account it holds). Fidelity Go: no (holds your money at Fidelity) (manages a separate account it holds). If keeping your current broker matters, that distinction is often the deciding factor.
Does Facet see my real holdings?
+
Facet does not read the brokerage you already use. It opens and holds a new account, then invests the money you move into it, so its view is limited to what sits inside Facet. By contrast, Fidelity Go manages a separate account it holds: Fidelity Go does not read the brokerage you already use. It opens and holds a new account, then invests the money you move into it, so its view is limited to what sits inside Fidelity Go.
Facet vs Fidelity Go: which is cheaper?
+
Facet: $2,600, $5,500 or $8,700/yr flat, no asset minimum (Oct 2026). Fidelity Go: $0 under $25,000, then 0.35%/yr, no minimum to open (Oct 2026). A percentage of assets grows with your balance and a flat subscription does not, so compare in dollars at your balance. Prices marked (Oct 2026) were checked on the vendor's own site in October 2026.
Can I use Facet and Fidelity Go together?
+
Often yes, because they do different things: one for flat-fee financial planning with a dedicated CFP and the other for small balances, where it is free. Watch for overlapping subscription costs, and remember that trades settle in whatever account actually holds your money.
Who is Facet best for, and who is Fidelity Go best for?
+
Facet best fits someone with a few hundred thousand or more, or real complexity, who wants planning more than portfolio management and objects to paying a percentage. Fidelity Go best fits someone with a smaller balance who wants automation at no cost and holds it in a retirement account where harvesting would not apply anyway. If you see yourself in one description more than the other, that is usually the clearer signal than any single feature or price.
What are the main trade-offs between Facet and Fidelity Go?
+
With Facet, watch for this: in absolute dollars the membership is significant, so at smaller balances a percentage fee is cheaper. With Fidelity Go: no tax-loss harvesting, so the main reason to pay for a managed taxable account is absent. Pick the trade-off you can live with given the job you want done.
Where does Walnut fit between Facet and Fidelity Go?
+
Walnut is an AI investing app, and it is the pick for a keep, trim or exit read on the stocks you already own, and placing the trades you approve (free; Walnut Plus $9.99/mo on the web; no fee on assets). It connects the brokerage you already use, read-only by default, gives each holding a keep, trim or exit read against the S&P 500, builds thematic baskets with target weights, and places the trades you approve. You use it through its own assistant, or inside Claude or ChatGPT.
Related comparisons
Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Competitor features and pricing are point-in-time and change; verify the current details on each provider's site before deciding. Nothing here is a recommendation to use any particular product or security.