Range vs Wealthsimple: Which Is Better in 2026?
Last updated November 2026
Short answer
Range is a robo-advisor (hands-off automated investing); Wealthsimple is a robo-advisor (hands-off automated investing). Best for high earners with equity compensation, on a flat membership: Range ($3,950 to $12,500/yr flat membership, no AUM fee (Oct 2026)). Best for canadian investors wanting automation and self-directed trading in one place: Wealthsimple (0.5%/yr under C$100,000, 0.4% from C$100,000 (Oct 2026)). Best for a keep, trim or exit read on the stocks you already own, with the trades you approve placed for you: Walnut, an AI investing app (free; Walnut Plus $9.99/mo on the web; no fee on assets).
Both Range and Wealthsimple get grouped under “AI investing tools,” which is why people compare them. Below is what each one does, whether it reads the brokerage you already use, how each is priced, and who each fits, checked in October 2026. Walnut, which publishes this page, is an AI investing app and is noted where it fits.
Range vs Wealthsimple at a glance
| Range | Wealthsimple | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Hands-off automated investing (robo-advisors) | Hands-off automated investing (robo-advisors) |
| What the AI does | Software layer over human advice | Automates a diversified portfolio |
| Connects your broker | Aggregates accounts for the advice picture | No (holds your money at Wealthsimple) |
| Read vs trade | Advisor-managed where applicable | Automated, plus self-directed trading |
| Cost | $3,950 to $12,500/yr flat membership, no AUM fee (Oct 2026) | 0.5%/yr under C$100,000, 0.4% from C$100,000 (Oct 2026) |
| Best for | High earners with equity compensation, on a flat membership | Canadian investors wanting automation and self-directed trading in one place |
| One limitation | Aimed at high household income, so the membership is poor value for a simpler situation. | It is a Canadian service, so it is not an option for US investors. |
Prices checked October 2026. A price marked (Oct 2026) was read on the vendor's own pricing page; others are described without a number because we could not verify one.
What is Range?
A flat-fee wealth management membership aimed at high-earning professionals, with equity compensation and tax planning at the centre.
How it works: You pay a flat annual membership and get advisors plus software covering equity compensation, tax planning, retirement projections and estate coordination, with accounts aggregated for a whole picture. The design assumes a high income and complexity from RSUs or options, even without a large accumulated balance.
In practice, Range’s AI software layer over human advice. It is a robo-advisor (hands-off automated investing), best suited to high earners with equity compensation, on a flat membership. On connecting an account: aggregates accounts for the advice picture. On execution: advisor-managed where applicable. Cost: $3,950 to $12,500/yr flat membership, no AUM fee (Oct 2026).
One real limitation: Aimed at high household income, so the membership is poor value for a simpler situation.
What is Wealthsimple?
Canada's largest independent automated investing service, combining managed portfolios with commission-free self-directed trading and banking features.
How it works: A questionnaire sets a managed portfolio of low-cost ETFs, rebalanced automatically, with the management fee tiered down as balances rise. Alongside it, Wealthsimple offers self-directed trading, cash accounts and tax filing, which makes it closer to a full financial app than a pure robo-advisor.
In practice, Wealthsimple’s AI automates a diversified portfolio. It is a robo-advisor (hands-off automated investing), best suited to canadian investors wanting automation and self-directed trading in one place. On connecting an account: no (holds your money at Wealthsimple). On execution: automated, plus self-directed trading. Cost: 0.5%/yr under C$100,000, 0.4% from C$100,000 (Oct 2026).
One real limitation: It is a Canadian service, so it is not an option for US investors.
Range vs Wealthsimple: how they actually differ
Category comes first. Range focuses on high earners with equity compensation, on a flat membership (software layer over human advice), and Wealthsimple on canadian investors wanting automation and self-directed trading in one place (automates a diversified portfolio). On broker connection they differ too: Range is “Aggregates accounts for the advice picture” versus Wealthsimple at “No (holds your money at Wealthsimple)”. That shapes everything downstream: how personal the answers are, where trades settle, and how much control you keep over individual positions.
Range vs Wealthsimple: strengths and trade-offs
Every tool gives something up for what it does well. Below is the give-and-take on each, so you can weigh the specific strengths against the limitations that come with them, beyond the headline category.
Range
Where it is strong
- Equity compensation is treated as a core problem
- Flat membership means the fee does not scale with a balance that may be growing quickly
- Aggregation across accounts, including ones it does not manage
What to watch out for
- Priced for high earners; a straightforward situation does not need this
- Value depends on using the planning, not just holding the membership
Wealthsimple
Where it is strong
- Managed and self-directed accounts side by side, so you do not choose one model for everything
- Fee tiers fall meaningfully at higher balances
- Broad product range including cash, tax filing and registered account types
What to watch out for
- Canada only, which rules it out for most readers comparing US services
- The breadth means the managed portfolios are conventional
The key divider: does it read your real holdings?
For AI investing tools, the distinction that matters most is whether the tool works from your actual, connected positions or reasons from something else: a separate account it manages for you, or the tickers and numbers you feed it. It decides how personal the answers can be, and where your money physically lives.
- Range: reads your real connected holdings. Range connects your real brokerage (Aggregates accounts for the advice picture) and works from your actual positions, so its answers reflect what you actually own.
- Wealthsimple: manages a separate account it holds. Wealthsimple does not read the brokerage you already use. It opens and holds a new account, then invests the money you move into it, so its view is limited to what sits inside Wealthsimple.
This is where they diverge most. One works from your real, connected account while the other does not, so if you want an assistant grounded in the exact positions you already hold, that gap is the thing to weigh first. This holdings-aware angle is the one Walnut is built around: it connects the brokerage you already use and reasons from your live positions, read-only by default, with any trades left for you to approve.
Range vs Wealthsimple: which should you choose?
Each one wins a different job, so the answer depends on which job you need done.
- Choose Range if you want high earners with equity compensation, on a flat membership. Its AI software layer over human advice, and it costs $3,950 to $12,500/yr flat membership, no AUM fee (Oct 2026). It is built for a high-earning professional with RSUs or options whose complexity comes from compensation more than from an accumulated portfolio. Keep in mind: aimed at high household income, so the membership is poor value for a simpler situation.
- Choose Wealthsimple if you want canadian investors wanting automation and self-directed trading in one place. Its AI automates a diversified portfolio, and it costs 0.5%/yr under C$100,000, 0.4% from C$100,000 (Oct 2026). It is built for a Canadian investor who wants one app for a managed portfolio, self-directed trades and cash. Keep in mind: it is a Canadian service, so it is not an option for US investors.
- Choose Walnut if you want a keep, trim or exit read on the stocks you already own, and placing the trades you approve. It is an AI investing app that connects the broker you already use, and it costs free; Walnut Plus $9.99/mo on the web; no fee on assets.
Because both sit in the same category, the choice comes down to the finer details above. Their basic approach is the same.
Range vs Wealthsimple: pricing and cost model
Cost is easy to misread when two tools charge in different shapes, so compare the model, not just the number. Range: $3,950 to $12,500/yr flat membership, no AUM fee (Oct 2026). Wealthsimple: 0.5%/yr under C$100,000, 0.4% from C$100,000 (Oct 2026). A percentage-of-assets fee scales with your balance, a flat subscription does not, and a “free” tier usually earns elsewhere (on cash, order flow, or premium upgrades), so the cheapest headline is not always the cheapest outcome for your situation.
Prices checked October 2026. Pricing and tiers change, so confirm the current numbers on each provider’s own site before you decide.
Where Walnut fits
Walnut is an AI investing app, and it is the pick for a keep, trim or exit read on the stocks you already own, and placing the trades you approve (free; Walnut Plus $9.99/mo on the web; no fee on assets). It connects the brokerage you already use, read-only by default, gives each holding a keep, trim or exit read against the S&P 500, flags any position above a quarter of the portfolio, and places the trades you approve. You use it through its own assistant, or inside Claude or ChatGPT. See Walnut vs Range and Walnut vs Wealthsimple.
Try Walnut on top of your broker
Free. Connect the broker you already use, and ask anything about what you own.
FAQ
Is Range or Wealthsimple better?
+
Range is better for high earners with equity compensation, on a flat membership ($3,950 to $12,500/yr flat membership, no AUM fee (Oct 2026)). Wealthsimple is better for canadian investors wanting automation and self-directed trading in one place (0.5%/yr under C$100,000, 0.4% from C$100,000 (Oct 2026)). Range is a robo-advisor (hands-off automated investing) and Wealthsimple is a robo-advisor (hands-off automated investing), so the right pick is the one whose job you want done.
What is the difference between Range and Wealthsimple?
+
Range is a robo-advisor (hands-off automated investing): it software layer over human advice. Wealthsimple is a robo-advisor (hands-off automated investing): it automates a diversified portfolio. Range suits high earners with equity compensation, on a flat membership; Wealthsimple suits canadian investors wanting automation and self-directed trading in one place.
Is Range or Wealthsimple better for beginners?
+
Range is the more beginner-friendly of the two (high earners with equity compensation, on a flat membership). The other is better once you know what you want from it. Neither replaces understanding what you own.
Does Range connect to my brokerage?
+
Range: aggregates accounts for the advice picture (reads your real connected holdings). Wealthsimple: no (holds your money at Wealthsimple) (manages a separate account it holds). If keeping your current broker matters, that distinction is often the deciding factor.
Does Range see my real holdings?
+
Range connects your real brokerage (Aggregates accounts for the advice picture) and works from your actual positions, so its answers reflect what you actually own. By contrast, Wealthsimple manages a separate account it holds: Wealthsimple does not read the brokerage you already use. It opens and holds a new account, then invests the money you move into it, so its view is limited to what sits inside Wealthsimple.
Range vs Wealthsimple: which is cheaper?
+
Range: $3,950 to $12,500/yr flat membership, no AUM fee (Oct 2026). Wealthsimple: 0.5%/yr under C$100,000, 0.4% from C$100,000 (Oct 2026). A percentage of assets grows with your balance and a flat subscription does not, so compare in dollars at your balance. Prices marked (Oct 2026) were checked on the vendor's own site in October 2026.
Can I use Range and Wealthsimple together?
+
Often yes, because they do different things: one for high earners with equity compensation, on a flat membership and the other for canadian investors wanting automation and self-directed trading in one place. Watch for overlapping subscription costs, and remember that trades settle in whatever account actually holds your money.
Who is Range best for, and who is Wealthsimple best for?
+
Range best fits a high-earning professional with RSUs or options whose complexity comes from compensation more than from an accumulated portfolio. Wealthsimple best fits a Canadian investor who wants one app for a managed portfolio, self-directed trades and cash. If you see yourself in one description more than the other, that is usually the clearer signal than any single feature or price.
What are the main trade-offs between Range and Wealthsimple?
+
With Range, watch for this: priced for high earners; a straightforward situation does not need this. With Wealthsimple: canada only, which rules it out for most readers comparing US services. Pick the trade-off you can live with given the job you want done.
Where does Walnut fit between Range and Wealthsimple?
+
Walnut is an AI investing app, and it is the pick for a keep, trim or exit read on the stocks you already own, and placing the trades you approve (free; Walnut Plus $9.99/mo on the web; no fee on assets). It connects the brokerage you already use, read-only by default, gives each holding a keep, trim or exit read against the S&P 500, builds thematic baskets with target weights, and places the trades you approve. You use it through its own assistant, or inside Claude or ChatGPT.
Related comparisons
Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Competitor features and pricing are point-in-time and change; verify the current details on each provider's site before deciding. Nothing here is a recommendation to use any particular product or security.