BOH vs WFC: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?
Last updated August 2026
Short answer
WFC is the larger of the two ($261.42B market cap): the incumbent the market prices for continued execution (10.97x forward earnings, beta 0.92). BOH is the smaller challenger ($3.15B), priced similarly on forward earnings (11.79x): more room to run, but more to prove. The real question is which set of drivers you believe, and whether owning one (or both) leaves you over-concentrated.
BOH vs WFC: the tie-breaker metrics
Same yardstick, side by side (as of August 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.
| Metric | BOH | WFC | What it tells you |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $3.15B | $261.42B | Size. The larger name is the incumbent; the smaller has more room to grow and more to prove. |
| Forward P/E | 11.79 | 10.97 | Valuation on next year's expected earnings, the same yardstick for both. Lower is cheaper for that growth; higher means the market is paying up. |
| Trailing P/E | 14.85 | 12.57 | Valuation on the last 12 months. A big drop from trailing to forward means the market expects earnings to jump, so more growth is already in the price. |
| Beta | 0.69 | 0.92 | Volatility vs the market. Above 1 swings harder than the index; below 1 is steadier. Higher beta means bigger drawdowns to hold through. |
| Price vs 52-week range | 76% of range | 55% of range | Where today's price sits between the 52-week low and high. Near the high is momentum with less margin of safety; near the low is out of favor or a discount, depending on why. |
| Price / book | 2.06 | 1.63 | How much you pay over book value. Very high can signal an asset-light, high-return business or a rich price. |
Before you buy: how BOH and WFC affect your concentration
The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. BOH and WFC share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.
This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined BOH and WFC exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.
What does Bank of Hawaii Corporation (BOH) do?
Bank of Hawaii Corporation (NYSE: BOH) is the holding company for Bank of Hawaii, a financial institution founded in 1897 that serves customers in Hawaii, Guam, and other Pacific islands. The bank operates through three segments: Consumer Banking (residential mortgages, home equity lines, auto loans, credit cards, deposit accounts, private banking, and trust and investment management), Commercial Banking (corporate lending, commercial real estate loans, lease financing, treasury and merchant services), and Treasury (the securities portfolio and balance-sheet management). Like most banks, BOH earns money in two main ways: net interest income, the spread between what it earns on loans and securities and what it pays on deposits, plus noninterest fee income from cards, trust and wealth services, and deposit-related fees.
What does Wells Fargo (WFC) do?
Wells Fargo & Company (NYSE: WFC) is one of the largest financial institutions in the United States, with roughly $1.9-2.0 trillion in assets and operations organized into four segments: Consumer Banking and Lending (checking, savings, mortgages, auto loans, and credit cards), Commercial Banking (lending and treasury services for middle-market companies), Corporate and Investment Banking (markets trading, banking, and lending for large clients), and Wealth and Investment Management (advisory and private banking). The bank makes money in two broad ways: net interest income, the spread between what it earns on loans and securities and what it pays on deposits, which was roughly $47.7 billion in 2025, and noninterest fee income from cards, investment banking, trading, wealth management, and deposit services.
BOH vs WFC: how do they differ?
Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.
- BOH drivers: Recovering net interest margin; Dominant, low-cost deposit franchise.
- WFC drivers: Asset cap removal unlocks balance-sheet growth; Turnaround economics and rising returns.
Which fits which kind of investor
A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: BOH is geographically concentrated in Hawaii, Guam, and the Pacific, so a downturn in Hawaii tourism, employment, or real estate would hit loan demand, credit quality, and deposits harder than it would a diversified national bank. For WFC, wells Fargo is highly sensitive to interest rates: net interest income is its single largest revenue line (about $47.7 billion in 2025), so falling rates or deposit repricing can compress earnings, and 2025 revenue was roughly flat partly because of lower net interest income.
BOH or WFC: which should you pick?
Growth-minded investors who believe the theme has years to run tend to accept the richer multiple for more upside; value-minded investors lean toward the cheaper forward earnings and steadier profile. Pick BOH if you believe its drivers more; WFC if you believe its. Many investors hold both, but since they share themes, that is a concentrated bet, not diversification. Decide deliberately and check overlap. For the full detail, see the BOH and WFC guides.
BOH vs WFC: the full fundamentals
BOH. At a recent price near $86 and a P/E in the high-teens, BOH trades at a premium to many regional-bank peers, which the market appears to attribute to its dominant Hawaii franchise and stable deposit base. Earnings improved through 2025 and into 2026 as the net interest margin recovered. Bank valuations also hinge on tangible book value, capital ratios, and credit trends, so figures shift with the rate cycle.
WFC. Reading a large bank means looking past a single earnings number to a handful of structural metrics. Return on tangible common equity (ROTCE) shows how efficiently the bank turns shareholder capital into profit; Wells Fargo's ~14.6% in 2025 trails best-in-class peers but is rising toward its 17-18% target. The efficiency ratio (costs as a share of revenue, running in the mid-60s percent) measures how lean the operation is, and net interest income tracks the rate-sensitive core of profitability. The CET1 ratio (~10.6%) gauges capital strength and how much room exists for buybacks and dividends, and Wells Fargo has been returning large amounts of capital. The distinctive upside here is the 2025 asset-cap removal, which lifts a structural lid on growth that constrained the bank for seven years; the open question is how much of that future growth is already reflected in the share price.
Headline figures (approximate, July 2026): BOH shows market cap ~$3.4 billion, full-year 2025 net income ~$205.9 million, full-year 2025 diluted eps ~$4.63, q1 2026 net interest income ~$151.0 million (NIM ~2.74%); WFC shows full-year 2025 total revenue ~$82 billion, full-year 2025 net income ~$21.3 billion (up ~8%), full-year 2025 diluted eps $6.26 (up ~17%), return on tangible common equity (fy2025) ~14.6% (target ~17-18% medium-term).
The bottom line: BOH vs WFC
BOH and WFC are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined BOH and WFC exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.
Wondering how BOH or WFC fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.
Investing in Bank of Hawaii Corporation with AI
Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how BOH fits what you actually hold: whether you own it already through a fund, what it would do to your concentration, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.
FAQ
What is the difference between BOH and WFC?
+
Bank of Hawaii Corporation (NYSE: BOH) is the holding company for Bank of Hawaii, a financial institution founded in 1897 that serves customers in Hawaii, Guam, and other Pacific islands. Wells Fargo & Company (NYSE: WFC) is one of the largest financial institutions in the United States, with roughly $1.9-2.0 trillion in assets and operations organized into four segments: Consumer Banking and Lending (checking, savings, mortgages, auto loans, and credit cards), Commercial Banking (lending and treasury services for middle-market companies), Corporate and Investment Banking (markets trading, banking, and lending for large clients), and Wealth and Investment Management (advisory and private banking). They show up together because they share investment themes, but they are different businesses, so the better fit depends on which thesis you are expressing.
Is BOH or WFC the better stock?
+
Neither is universally better. WFC is the larger incumbent; BOH is the smaller challenger and looks pricier on forward earnings. Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Compare what each does, the tie-breaker metrics above, and the risks, then decide which fits your thesis and what you already own.
Which is cheaper, BOH or WFC?
+
On forward P/E (as of August 2026), BOH trades at 11.79x and WFC at 10.97x, so WFC is the cheaper of the two on next year's expected earnings. A lower multiple is not automatically the better buy: a richer valuation can be justified by faster growth, and a lower one can reflect real risk. Weigh the multiple against how fast each business is compounding.
Should you own both BOH and WFC?
+
Because they share themes, owning both concentrates you in that theme. That can be intentional (a focused bet) or accidental (less diversification than it looks). Walnut can show your combined exposure across both, and whether adding either over-concentrates you, before you buy.
What are the risks of BOH vs WFC?
+
BOH: BOH is geographically concentrated in Hawaii, Guam, and the Pacific, so a downturn in Hawaii tourism, employment, or real estate would hit loan demand, credit quality, and deposits harder than it would a diversified national bank. Its loan book skews toward residential and commercial real estate, leaving it exposed to property-value declines and rising vacancies. As a bank, it is highly rate-sensitive: the margin recovery depends on the path of interest rates and deposit repricing, and a sharp move in either direction could compress spread income. The securities portfolio carries unrealized losses common across regional banks that rose with rates, which can pressure tangible book value. Broader risks include the credit cycle, deposit competition, regulatory and capital requirements, and any renewed stress in the regional-banking sector. WFC: Wells Fargo is highly sensitive to interest rates: net interest income is its single largest revenue line (about $47.7 billion in 2025), so falling rates or deposit repricing can compress earnings, and 2025 revenue was roughly flat partly because of lower net interest income. As an economically cyclical bank, it is exposed to the credit cycle, where a recession or rising unemployment would increase loan losses, particularly in cards, commercial real estate, and consumer lending. Regulatory legacy remains a factor: while the asset cap is lifted, certain consent-order provisions from the 2016 fake-accounts scandal persist and reputational and compliance costs can recur. Execution risk is real now that the cap is gone, because growing profitably without re-introducing the controls problems of the past is unproven at scale. Finally, broad macro risks (trade and geopolitical uncertainty, fiscal pressures, and market volatility) could weigh on loan demand, fee income, and the value of the bank's securities portfolio.
Related comparisons
Browse all stock comparisons.
Walnut is informational, not investment advice. This page is descriptive and not a recommendation to buy or sell BOH or WFC; figures are approximate and dated (as of August 2026). Verify current data before investing.