OMVKY vs TTE: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

Last updated October 2026

Short answer

TTE is the larger of the two ($185.17B market cap): the incumbent the market prices for continued execution (7.84x forward earnings, beta 0.06). OMVKY is the smaller challenger ($26.34B), actually pricier on forward earnings (16.41x): more room to run, but more to prove. The real question is which set of drivers you believe, and whether owning one (or both) leaves you over-concentrated.

OMVKY vs TTE: the tie-breaker metrics

Same yardstick, side by side (as of October 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.

MetricOMVKYTTEWhat it tells you
Market cap$26.34B$185.17BSize. The larger name is the incumbent; the smaller has more room to grow and more to prove.
Forward P/E16.417.84Valuation on next year's expected earnings, the same yardstick for both. Lower is cheaper for that growth; higher means the market is paying up.
Trailing P/E14.5310.50Valuation on the last 12 months. A big drop from trailing to forward means the market expects earnings to jump, so more growth is already in the price.
Beta0.260.06Volatility vs the market. Above 1 swings harder than the index; below 1 is steadier. Higher beta means bigger drawdowns to hold through.
Price vs 52-week range90% of range72% of rangeWhere today's price sits between the 52-week low and high. Near the high is momentum with less margin of safety; near the low is out of favor or a discount, depending on why.
Price / book0.391.45How much you pay over book value. Very high can signal an asset-light, high-return business or a rich price.

Reading it: TTE is the cheaper of the two on forward earnings, but cheaper is not the same as better. Pair the valuation with growth (how far the forward P/E sits below the trailing P/E) and risk (beta) before you decide.

Before you buy: how OMVKY and TTE affect your concentration

The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. OMVKY and TTE share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.

This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined OMVKY and TTE exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.

What does OMV Aktiengesellschaft (OMVKY) do?

OMV Aktiengesellschaft is an Austrian energy and chemicals group headquartered in Vienna. It reports three segments. Energy produces oil and gas (291 thousand barrels of oil equivalent per day in Q2 2026) from Romania, Austria, Norway, Libya, the United Arab Emirates, New Zealand and Tunisia,. Fuels runs three European refineries (Schwechat near Vienna, Burghausen in Germany and Petrobrazi in Romania), a retail station network and stakes in ADNOC Refining and ADNOC Global Trading. Chemicals combines OMV's own refinery-integrated steam crackers with its 50% share of Borouge International, the polyolefins group formed with ADNOC's investment arm XRG on March 30, 2026. Sales revenue from continuing operations was ~EUR 24.3 billion in 2025, and the clean CCS Operating Result (OMV's main profit measure, excluding special items and inventory effects) was ~EUR 4.6 billion, of which Energy contributed ~EUR 2.7 billion.

Full OMVKY guide

What does TotalEnergies (TTE) do?

TotalEnergies is one of the world's largest publicly traded integrated energy companies, headquartered in France and listed in the US as an ADR under the ticker TTE. It operates across the full energy chain: Exploration & Production finds and produces crude oil and natural gas; Integrated LNG manages one of the largest global liquefied natural gas portfolios; Refining & Chemicals turns crude into fuels and petrochemicals; and Marketing & Services runs retail fuel stations. What distinguishes TotalEnergies from US majors like Exxon and Chevron is its Integrated Power segment, a deliberate and aggressive expansion into renewable electricity generation, storage, and retail power, with more than 20 GW of gross installed renewable capacity and a target for power to reach roughly 20% of its energy output by the end of the decade.

Full TTE guide

OMVKY vs TTE: how do they differ?

Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.

  • OMVKY drivers: Oil and gas prices after the Hormuz shock; Refining margins and European fuels policy.
  • TTE drivers: LNG portfolio strength; Production growth from new projects.

Which fits which kind of investor

A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: The clearest risk is that 2026 earnings are inflated by a supply shock: OMV's Q2 2026 profit jump came from Brent averaging ~USD 104 and a refining indicator margin of ~USD 20.3 a barrel, yet the company's own report says Brent had returned to the low 70s by the end of June after the US-Iran memorandum, and renewed escalation in July shows the situation can swing either way. For TTE, totalEnergies' earnings are highly cyclical because they swing with oil, natural gas, and LNG prices, which the company does not control and which depend on global supply, demand, and OPEC decisions; 2025 profit fell about 15% to 17% as prices declined.

OMVKY or TTE: which should you pick?

Growth-minded investors who believe the theme has years to run tend to accept the richer multiple for more upside; value-minded investors lean toward the cheaper forward earnings and steadier profile. Pick OMVKY if you believe its drivers more; TTE if you believe its. Many investors hold both, but since they share themes, that is a concentrated bet, not diversification. Decide deliberately and check overlap. For the full detail, see the OMVKY and TTE guides.

OMVKY vs TTE: the full fundamentals

OMVKY. The trailing figures combine full-year 2025 with the first half of 2026 and swap out the first half of 2025, using OMV's reported numbers. They capture one strong quarter driven by the Hormuz disruption, so they overstate a typical year: 2025 clean CCS EPS was EUR 5.94 and the 2030 target is above EUR 9. The dividend looks generous next to either, but the 2025 payout was 141% of reported EPS, funded by cash flow rather than book profit. Revenue also moved for an accounting reason, since sales to Borealis are no longer eliminated after deconsolidation. Per-ADR figures divide the per-share amount by four and are before currency conversion, depositary fees and Austrian withholding tax.

TTE. As of July 2026 the NYSE ADR trades near $81 with a market cap around $178 to $180 billion and about 2.16 billion shares outstanding. TotalEnergies trades at a lower earnings multiple (trailing P/E near 11x, forward near 9x) than US majors Exxon and Chevron, partly reflecting its European listing, currency and tax friction for US holders, and skepticism about renewable returns. The higher dividend yield near 5% is a notable feature of the total-return profile.

Headline figures (approximate, October 2026): OMVKY shows sales revenue, continuing ops (ttm to june 2026) ~EUR 26.2 billion, clean ccs operating result (ttm) ~EUR 5.1 billion, clean ccs eps (ttm) ~EUR 7.34 per share (~EUR 1.84 per ADR), net debt (june 30, 2026) ~EUR 5.0 billion, 19% leverage ratio; TTE shows revenue (fy2025) ~$201 billion, adjusted net income (fy2025) ~$15.6 billion, ifrs net income (fy2025) ~$13.1 billion, production ~2,529 thousand boe/d (+4%).

The bottom line: OMVKY vs TTE

OMVKY and TTE are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined OMVKY and TTE exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.

Wondering how OMVKY or TTE fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.

Investing in OMV Aktiengesellschaft with AI

Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how OMVKY fits what you actually hold: whether you own it already through a fund, what it would do to your concentration, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.

FAQ

What is the difference between OMVKY and TTE?

+

OMV Aktiengesellschaft is an Austrian energy and chemicals group headquartered in Vienna. TotalEnergies is one of the world's largest publicly traded integrated energy companies, headquartered in France and listed in the US as an ADR under the ticker TTE. They show up together because they share investment themes, but they are different businesses, so the better fit depends on which thesis you are expressing.

Is OMVKY or TTE the better stock?

+

Neither is universally better. TTE is the larger incumbent; OMVKY is the smaller challenger and looks pricier on forward earnings. Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Compare what each does, the tie-breaker metrics above, and the risks, then decide which fits your thesis and what you already own.

Which is cheaper, OMVKY or TTE?

+

On forward P/E (as of October 2026), OMVKY trades at 16.41x and TTE at 7.84x, so TTE is the cheaper of the two on next year's expected earnings. A lower multiple is not automatically the better buy: a richer valuation can be justified by faster growth, and a lower one can reflect real risk. Weigh the multiple against how fast each business is compounding.

Should you own both OMVKY and TTE?

+

Because they share themes, owning both concentrates you in that theme. That can be intentional (a focused bet) or accidental (less diversification than it looks). Walnut can show your combined exposure across both, and whether adding either over-concentrates you, before you buy.

What are the risks of OMVKY vs TTE?

+

OMVKY: The clearest risk is that 2026 earnings are inflated by a supply shock: OMV's Q2 2026 profit jump came from Brent averaging ~USD 104 and a refining indicator margin of ~USD 20.3 a barrel, yet the company's own report says Brent had returned to the low 70s by the end of June after the US-Iran memorandum, and renewed escalation in July shows the situation can swing either way. Hydrocarbon sales volumes still fell 12% in Q2 as Middle East liftings stalled. Governments are a second risk. Romania and Austria imposed temporary fuel price measures in 2026, Romania levies an E&P solidarity tax and higher gas royalties, and OMV's Q2 clean CCS group tax rate was still 34% (48% on reported continuing profit). Leverage rose from 12% to 19% in a year, with net debt at ~EUR 5.0 billion after the ~EUR 1.5 billion Borouge International injection, and H1 2026 free cash flow after dividends was about minus EUR 3.3 billion. Chemicals remain cyclical, and OMV now depends on dividends from a jointly controlled company carrying NOVA acquisition debt. Reserves fell to ~880 million boe after the Ghasha sale, so Neptun Deep's 2027 start matters. For US holders of OMVKY there are added layers: a Level I ADR on the OTC market with thinner trading and less US disclosure than an exchange listing, euro-to-dollar currency risk on both the price and the dividend, ADR depositary fees, and Austrian withholding tax on dividends, which US investors may need to reclaim partly under the tax treaty. TTE: TotalEnergies' earnings are highly cyclical because they swing with oil, natural gas, and LNG prices, which the company does not control and which depend on global supply, demand, and OPEC decisions; 2025 profit fell about 15% to 17% as prices declined. As a European company reporting in dollars while paying dividends in euros, US ADR holders also carry currency and foreign-withholding-tax exposure on the dividend. The long-term energy transition is a structural risk: heavy capital going into renewables and power may earn lower returns than legacy oil and gas, while a faster-than-expected shift away from fossil fuels could erode the value of reserves. The company also faces geopolitical risk in the many regions where it operates, plus regulatory, tax, litigation, and climate-policy pressure that could raise costs or limit growth.

Walnut is informational, not investment advice. This page is descriptive and not a recommendation to buy or sell OMVKY or TTE; figures are approximate and dated (as of October 2026). Verify current data before investing.