QGEN vs TMO: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?
Last updated August 2026
Short answer
QGEN and TMO are similarly sized, but QGEN trades noticeably cheaper on forward earnings (15.78x vs 20.88x): the market is paying up for TMO's profile and pricing QGEN more conservatively, or for faster growth. Which you prefer comes down to the drivers you believe, and whether adding either over-concentrates what you already own.
QGEN vs TMO: the tie-breaker metrics
Same yardstick, side by side (as of August 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.
| Metric | QGEN | TMO | What it tells you |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forward P/E | 15.78 | 20.88 | Valuation on next year's expected earnings, the same yardstick for both. Lower is cheaper for that growth; higher means the market is paying up. |
| Trailing P/E | 21.12 | 30.86 | Valuation on the last 12 months. A big drop from trailing to forward means the market expects earnings to jump, so more growth is already in the price. |
| Beta | 0.64 | 0.87 | Volatility vs the market. Above 1 swings harder than the index; below 1 is steadier. Higher beta means bigger drawdowns to hold through. |
| Price vs 52-week range | 35% of range | 67% of range | Where today's price sits between the 52-week low and high. Near the high is momentum with less margin of safety; near the low is out of favor or a discount, depending on why. |
| Price / book | 2.56 | 4.11 | How much you pay over book value. Very high can signal an asset-light, high-return business or a rich price. |
Reading it: QGEN is the cheaper of the two on forward earnings, but cheaper is not the same as better. Pair the valuation with growth (how far the forward P/E sits below the trailing P/E) and risk (beta) before you decide.
Before you buy: how QGEN and TMO affect your concentration
The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. QGEN and TMO share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.
This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined QGEN and TMO exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.
What does QIAGEN (QGEN) do?
QIAGEN makes the consumables and instruments labs use to collect, stabilize, purify, and analyze DNA and RNA, then extends into molecular diagnostics through platforms like QIAstat-Dx (syndromic infectious-disease testing), QuantiFERON (latent tuberculosis detection), and QIAcuity digital PCR. It serves more than 500,000 customers across molecular diagnostics, applied testing, academic research, and pharma, with a portfolio of 500-plus proprietary consumables and automated workflows. The December 2025 acquisition of Parse Biosciences pushed its Sample technologies franchise into single-cell analysis, one of five strategic growth pillars the company is steering toward its 2028 goals.
What does Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) do?
Thermo Fisher Scientific, headquartered in Waltham, Massachusetts, is a global provider of scientific instruments, consumables, reagents, and services used across pharmaceutical and biotech drug development, clinical diagnostics, academic research, and environmental and industrial testing. The company operates through four reportable segments: Life Sciences Solutions (reagents, proteins, and consumables for research and bioproduction), Analytical Instruments (mass spectrometers, chromatography systems, electron microscopes, and laboratory equipment), Specialty Diagnostics (clinical diagnostic kits and transplant diagnostics), and Laboratory Products and Biopharma Services (supply-chain distribution, contract research through PPD, and contract drug manufacturing through Patheon). Revenue is generated through instrument sales, high-margin consumables and reagents that customers repurchase continuously, long-term service contracts, and growing contract development and manufacturing (CDMO) fees; consumables and services collectively account for a majority of annual sales and provide durable recurring revenue.
QGEN vs TMO: how do they differ?
Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.
- QGEN drivers: QIAstat-Dx syndromic testing; Sample technologies and single-cell.
- TMO drivers: Bioprocessing and Biologic Drug Manufacturing Tailwind; Recurring Consumables and Reagents Engine.
Which fits which kind of investor
A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: QuantiFERON tuberculosis sales have been a persistent drag and are exposed to competition and testing-volume swings. For TMO, the most significant near-term risk is a contraction in research funding from government agencies (including NIH) and from biotech companies whose access to capital markets has historically been cyclical; when funding tightens, customers delay instrument purchases and reduce consumable orders, pressuring organic revenue growth.
QGEN or TMO: which should you pick?
QGEN vs TMO: the full fundamentals
QGEN. Q1 2026 reported sales rose about 2 percent to roughly $492 million while constant-currency sales fell about 1 percent, and management guided full-year sales to about $2.1 billion and adjusted EPS to about $2.43, both below prior consensus. At a roughly $8.3 billion market cap the stock carries a mid-teens forward P/E, valuing it as a steady compounder rather than a high-growth name. The valuation reflects durable consumable revenue and margin discipline against low-single-digit organic growth.
TMO. Thermo Fisher's trailing price-to-earnings ratio of roughly 26x sits approximately 18% below its own ten-year historical average of about 32x, reflecting a period of softer organic growth as the post-pandemic diagnostics and COVID-related revenue tailwind has faded. The adjusted operating margin of 22.7% for 2025 and management guidance for 6 to 8 percent adjusted EPS growth in 2026 suggest the earnings recovery is progressing, though the pace of organic revenue acceleration remains a key variable the market is watching. Free cash flow of roughly $6.3 billion gives the company significant flexibility for continued share repurchases, dividends, and acquisitions.
Headline figures (approximate, Q1 2026): QGEN shows revenue (q1 2026) ~$492M, revenue (fy2026 guidance) ~$2.1B, adjusted eps (fy2026 guidance) ~$2.43, market cap ~$8.3B; TMO shows revenue (full year 2025) ~$44.6 billion, revenue guidance (full year 2026) ~$46.3 to $47.2 billion, adjusted operating income (full year 2025) ~$10.1 billion, adjusted operating margin (full year 2025) ~22.7%.
The bottom line: QGEN vs TMO
QGEN and TMO are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined QGEN and TMO exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.
Wondering how QGEN or TMO fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.
Investing in QIAGEN with AI
Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how QGEN fits what you actually hold: whether you own it already through a fund, what it would do to your concentration, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.
FAQ
What is the difference between QGEN and TMO?
+
QIAGEN makes the consumables and instruments labs use to collect, stabilize, purify, and analyze DNA and RNA, then extends into molecular diagnostics through platforms like QIAstat-Dx (syndromic infectious-disease testing), QuantiFERON (latent tuberculosis detection), and QIAcuity digital PCR. Thermo Fisher Scientific, headquartered in Waltham, Massachusetts, is a global provider of scientific instruments, consumables, reagents, and services used across pharmaceutical and biotech drug development, clinical diagnostics, academic research, and environmental and industrial testing. They show up together because they share investment themes, but they are different businesses, so the better fit depends on which thesis you are expressing.
Is QGEN or TMO the better stock?
+
Neither is universally better; they suit different views and risk levels. Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Compare what each does, the tie-breaker metrics above, and the risks, then decide which fits your thesis and what you already own.
Which is cheaper, QGEN or TMO?
+
On forward P/E (as of August 2026), QGEN trades at 15.78x and TMO at 20.88x, so QGEN is the cheaper of the two on next year's expected earnings. A lower multiple is not automatically the better buy: a richer valuation can be justified by faster growth, and a lower one can reflect real risk. Weigh the multiple against how fast each business is compounding.
Should you own both QGEN and TMO?
+
Because they share themes, owning both concentrates you in that theme. That can be intentional (a focused bet) or accidental (less diversification than it looks). Walnut can show your combined exposure across both, and whether adding either over-concentrates you, before you buy.
What are the risks of QGEN vs TMO?
+
QGEN: QuantiFERON tuberculosis sales have been a persistent drag and are exposed to competition and testing-volume swings. A large share of revenue tracks academic, pharma, and life-sciences research budgets, which softened in the U.S. and remain sensitive to funding cycles. Roughly half of sales are outside the U.S., so currency moves materially affect reported results (reported growth outpaced constant-currency growth in Q1 2026). QIAGEN competes against much larger, better-capitalized rivals, and guidance cuts have shown the top line is vulnerable to demand shocks. Integration of acquisitions like Parse Biosciences carries execution risk. TMO: The most significant near-term risk is a contraction in research funding from government agencies (including NIH) and from biotech companies whose access to capital markets has historically been cyclical; when funding tightens, customers delay instrument purchases and reduce consumable orders, pressuring organic revenue growth. Thermo Fisher's active acquisition strategy carries integration and leverage risk, particularly after committing approximately $13 billion to mergers and acquisitions in 2025 alone, and a large deal that underperforms expectations could weigh on earnings and the balance sheet simultaneously. Geopolitical friction, particularly regarding China, creates both a demand risk (softer orders from Chinese academic and industrial customers) and a supply chain risk, while tariff policy changes can disrupt cost structures. Finally, the stock's valuation, though below its own ten-year average on a trailing price-to-earnings basis, still prices in sustained mid-single-digit organic growth, leaving limited room for disappointment if end markets soften.
Related comparisons
Browse all stock comparisons.
Walnut is informational, not investment advice. This page is descriptive and not a recommendation to buy or sell QGEN or TMO; figures are approximate and dated (as of August 2026). Verify current data before investing.