E*Trade Core Portfolios vs Facet: Which Is Better in 2026?
Last updated November 2026
Short answer
E*Trade Core Portfolios is a robo-advisor (hands-off automated investing); Facet is a robo-advisor (hands-off automated investing). Best for e*Trade customers wanting a managed portfolio alongside self-directed trading: E*Trade Core Portfolios (0.30%/yr, $500 minimum (Oct 2026)). Best for flat-fee financial planning with a dedicated CFP: Facet ($2,600, $5,500 or $8,700/yr flat, no asset minimum (Oct 2026)). Best for a keep, trim or exit read on the stocks you already own, with the trades you approve placed for you: Walnut, an AI investing app (free; Walnut Plus $9.99/mo on the web; no fee on assets).
Both E*Trade Core Portfolios and Facet get grouped under “AI investing tools,” which is why people compare them. Below is what each one does, whether it reads the brokerage you already use, how each is priced, and who each fits, checked in October 2026. Walnut, which publishes this page, is an AI investing app and is noted where it fits.
E*Trade Core Portfolios vs Facet at a glance
| E*Trade Core Portfolios | Facet | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Hands-off automated investing (robo-advisors) | Hands-off automated investing (robo-advisors) |
| What the AI does | Automates a diversified ETF portfolio | None; this is human planning |
| Connects your broker | No (holds your money at E*Trade) | No (manages assets it custodies, planning covers the rest) |
| Read vs trade | Automated | Advisor-managed |
| Cost | 0.30%/yr, $500 minimum (Oct 2026) | $2,600, $5,500 or $8,700/yr flat, no asset minimum (Oct 2026) |
| Best for | E*Trade customers wanting a managed portfolio alongside self-directed trading | Flat-fee financial planning with a dedicated CFP |
| One limitation | A conventional service whose main advantage is sitting next to an E*Trade brokerage account. | The flat fee is large in absolute terms at small balances, so it only beats a percentage once you have enough assets or enough complexity. |
Prices checked October 2026. A price marked (Oct 2026) was read on the vendor's own pricing page; others are described without a number because we could not verify one.
What is E*Trade Core Portfolios?
E*Trade's automated investing service, offering managed ETF portfolios alongside its self-directed brokerage, now under Morgan Stanley.
How it works: A questionnaire sets a risk level and E*Trade invests in a diversified ETF portfolio with automatic rebalancing, including socially responsible and smart-beta variants. It sits alongside E*Trade's self-directed brokerage, so a managed portfolio and an account you trade yourself live under one login.
In practice, E*Trade Core Portfolios’s AI automates a diversified ETF portfolio. It is a robo-advisor (hands-off automated investing), best suited to e*Trade customers wanting a managed portfolio alongside self-directed trading. On connecting an account: no (holds your money at E*Trade). On execution: automated. Cost: 0.30%/yr, $500 minimum (Oct 2026).
One real limitation: A conventional service whose main advantage is sitting next to an E*Trade brokerage account.
What is Facet?
Flat-fee financial planning with a dedicated CFP professional, priced by complexity.
How it works: You pay an annual membership and are assigned a CFP professional who covers planning across tax, insurance, estate coordination and retirement, with investment management available inside it. Because the fee is flat and set by complexity, it does not rise as your portfolio grows, and that is its main argument against the percentage model.
In practice, Facet’s AI none; this is human planning. It is a robo-advisor (hands-off automated investing), best suited to flat-fee financial planning with a dedicated CFP. On connecting an account: no (manages assets it custodies, planning covers the rest). On execution: advisor-managed. Cost: $2,600, $5,500 or $8,700/yr flat, no asset minimum (Oct 2026).
One real limitation: The flat fee is large in absolute terms at small balances, so it only beats a percentage once you have enough assets or enough complexity.
E*Trade Core Portfolios vs Facet: how they actually differ
Category comes first. E*Trade Core Portfolios focuses on e*Trade customers wanting a managed portfolio alongside self-directed trading (automates a diversified ETF portfolio), and Facet on flat-fee financial planning with a dedicated CFP (none; this is human planning). On broker connection they differ too: E*Trade Core Portfolios is “No (holds your money at E*Trade)” versus Facet at “No (manages assets it custodies, planning covers the rest)”. That shapes everything downstream: how personal the answers are, where trades settle, and how much control you keep over individual positions.
E*Trade Core Portfolios vs Facet: strengths and trade-offs
Every tool gives something up for what it does well. Below is the give-and-take on each, so you can weigh the specific strengths against the limitations that come with them, beyond the headline category.
E*Trade Core Portfolios
Where it is strong
- Managed and self-directed accounts side by side under one login
- Portfolio variants including socially responsible options
- Backed by Morgan Stanley following the acquisition
What to watch out for
- Priced at the middle of the market with no distinguishing feature
- A minimum applies to open the managed portfolio
Facet
Where it is strong
- A flat fee that does not grow with your balance, which removes the incentive against advice that shrinks it
- A dedicated CFP professional of your own; there is no call centre or questionnaire
- Planning breadth beyond investing, including tax and insurance coordination
What to watch out for
- In absolute dollars the membership is significant, so at smaller balances a percentage fee is cheaper
- Pricing tiers by complexity, so confirm which tier your situation lands in before comparing
The key divider: does it read your real holdings?
For AI investing tools, the distinction that matters most is whether the tool works from your actual, connected positions or reasons from something else: a separate account it manages for you, or the tickers and numbers you feed it. It decides how personal the answers can be, and where your money physically lives.
- E*Trade Core Portfolios: manages a separate account it holds. E*Trade Core Portfolios does not read the brokerage you already use. It opens and holds a new account, then invests the money you move into it, so its view is limited to what sits inside E*Trade Core Portfolios.
- Facet: manages a separate account it holds. Facet does not read the brokerage you already use. It opens and holds a new account, then invests the money you move into it, so its view is limited to what sits inside Facet.
On this specific question the two land on the same side, so the deciding factors between them are elsewhere: category, cost, and who each is built for. This holdings-aware angle is the one Walnut is built around: it connects the brokerage you already use and reasons from your live positions, read-only by default, with any trades left for you to approve.
E*Trade Core Portfolios vs Facet: which should you choose?
Each one wins a different job, so the answer depends on which job you need done.
- Choose E*Trade Core Portfolios if you want e*Trade customers wanting a managed portfolio alongside self-directed trading. Its AI automates a diversified ETF portfolio, and it costs 0.30%/yr, $500 minimum (Oct 2026). It is built for an existing E*Trade customer who wants part of the money handled automatically and part self-directed. Keep in mind: a conventional service whose main advantage is sitting next to an E*Trade brokerage account.
- Choose Facet if you want flat-fee financial planning with a dedicated CFP. Its AI none; this is human planning, and it costs $2,600, $5,500 or $8,700/yr flat, no asset minimum (Oct 2026). It is built for someone with a few hundred thousand or more, or real complexity, who wants planning more than portfolio management and objects to paying a percentage. Keep in mind: the flat fee is large in absolute terms at small balances, so it only beats a percentage once you have enough assets or enough complexity.
- Choose Walnut if you want a keep, trim or exit read on the stocks you already own, and placing the trades you approve. It is an AI investing app that connects the broker you already use, and it costs free; Walnut Plus $9.99/mo on the web; no fee on assets.
Because both sit in the same category, the choice comes down to the finer details above. Their basic approach is the same.
E*Trade Core Portfolios vs Facet: pricing and cost model
Cost is easy to misread when two tools charge in different shapes, so compare the model, not just the number. E*Trade Core Portfolios: 0.30%/yr, $500 minimum (Oct 2026). Facet: $2,600, $5,500 or $8,700/yr flat, no asset minimum (Oct 2026). A percentage-of-assets fee scales with your balance, a flat subscription does not, and a “free” tier usually earns elsewhere (on cash, order flow, or premium upgrades), so the cheapest headline is not always the cheapest outcome for your situation.
Prices checked October 2026. Pricing and tiers change, so confirm the current numbers on each provider’s own site before you decide.
Where Walnut fits
Walnut is an AI investing app, and it is the pick for a keep, trim or exit read on the stocks you already own, and placing the trades you approve (free; Walnut Plus $9.99/mo on the web; no fee on assets). It connects the brokerage you already use, read-only by default, gives each holding a keep, trim or exit read against the S&P 500, flags any position above a quarter of the portfolio, and places the trades you approve. You use it through its own assistant, or inside Claude or ChatGPT. See Walnut vs E*Trade Core Portfolios and Walnut vs Facet.
Try Walnut on top of your broker
Free. Connect the broker you already use, and ask anything about what you own.
FAQ
Is E*Trade Core Portfolios or Facet better?
+
E*Trade Core Portfolios is better for e*Trade customers wanting a managed portfolio alongside self-directed trading (0.30%/yr, $500 minimum (Oct 2026)). Facet is better for flat-fee financial planning with a dedicated CFP ($2,600, $5,500 or $8,700/yr flat, no asset minimum (Oct 2026)). E*Trade Core Portfolios is a robo-advisor (hands-off automated investing) and Facet is a robo-advisor (hands-off automated investing), so the right pick is the one whose job you want done.
What is the difference between E*Trade Core Portfolios and Facet?
+
E*Trade Core Portfolios is a robo-advisor (hands-off automated investing): it automates a diversified ETF portfolio. Facet is a robo-advisor (hands-off automated investing): it none; this is human planning. E*Trade Core Portfolios suits e*Trade customers wanting a managed portfolio alongside self-directed trading; Facet suits flat-fee financial planning with a dedicated CFP.
Is E*Trade Core Portfolios or Facet better for beginners?
+
E*Trade Core Portfolios is the more beginner-friendly of the two (e*Trade customers wanting a managed portfolio alongside self-directed trading). The other is better once you know what you want from it. Neither replaces understanding what you own.
Does E*Trade Core Portfolios connect to my brokerage?
+
E*Trade Core Portfolios: no (holds your money at E*Trade) (manages a separate account it holds). Facet: no (manages assets it custodies, planning covers the rest) (manages a separate account it holds). If keeping your current broker matters, that distinction is often the deciding factor.
Does E*Trade Core Portfolios see my real holdings?
+
E*Trade Core Portfolios does not read the brokerage you already use. It opens and holds a new account, then invests the money you move into it, so its view is limited to what sits inside E*Trade Core Portfolios. By contrast, Facet manages a separate account it holds: Facet does not read the brokerage you already use. It opens and holds a new account, then invests the money you move into it, so its view is limited to what sits inside Facet.
E*Trade Core Portfolios vs Facet: which is cheaper?
+
E*Trade Core Portfolios: 0.30%/yr, $500 minimum (Oct 2026). Facet: $2,600, $5,500 or $8,700/yr flat, no asset minimum (Oct 2026). A percentage of assets grows with your balance and a flat subscription does not, so compare in dollars at your balance. Prices marked (Oct 2026) were checked on the vendor's own site in October 2026.
Can I use E*Trade Core Portfolios and Facet together?
+
Often yes, because they do different things: one for e*Trade customers wanting a managed portfolio alongside self-directed trading and the other for flat-fee financial planning with a dedicated CFP. Watch for overlapping subscription costs, and remember that trades settle in whatever account actually holds your money.
Who is E*Trade Core Portfolios best for, and who is Facet best for?
+
E*Trade Core Portfolios best fits an existing E*Trade customer who wants part of the money handled automatically and part self-directed. Facet best fits someone with a few hundred thousand or more, or real complexity, who wants planning more than portfolio management and objects to paying a percentage. If you see yourself in one description more than the other, that is usually the clearer signal than any single feature or price.
What are the main trade-offs between E*Trade Core Portfolios and Facet?
+
With E*Trade Core Portfolios, watch for this: priced at the middle of the market with no distinguishing feature. With Facet: in absolute dollars the membership is significant, so at smaller balances a percentage fee is cheaper. Pick the trade-off you can live with given the job you want done.
Where does Walnut fit between E*Trade Core Portfolios and Facet?
+
Walnut is an AI investing app, and it is the pick for a keep, trim or exit read on the stocks you already own, and placing the trades you approve (free; Walnut Plus $9.99/mo on the web; no fee on assets). It connects the brokerage you already use, read-only by default, gives each holding a keep, trim or exit read against the S&P 500, builds thematic baskets with target weights, and places the trades you approve. You use it through its own assistant, or inside Claude or ChatGPT.
Related comparisons
Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Competitor features and pricing are point-in-time and change; verify the current details on each provider's site before deciding. Nothing here is a recommendation to use any particular product or security.