M1 Finance vs Marcus Invest: Which Is Better in 2026?

Figures and features are point-in-time and change; treat the table as a starting map, not a live quote.

A pie-based investing platform where you choose the holdings and target weights and M1 automates the rebalancing. Between a robo-advisor and a brokerage.

How it works: You build a Pie of stocks and ETFs with target percentages, and every deposit is allocated to whatever is furthest below target, which rebalances the portfolio as you contribute rather than by selling. Trades execute in one or two daily windows rather than immediately, which is the design trade for the automation and the fractional-share support.

In practice, M1 Finance’s AI automates rebalancing toward weights you set. It falls under hands-off automated investing (robo-advisors), which makes it best suited to people who want to choose the holdings but automate the maintenance. On connecting an account it is “No (holds your money at M1)”, and on execution it is “Automated within your chosen weights”. It is priced as free tier plus a paid tier (verify current).

One honest limitation: Trading happens in scheduled windows rather than on demand, which suits long-term investing and frustrates anyone wanting control over execution.

Goldman Sachs' automated investing service, built around model ETF portfolios and sold alongside Marcus savings products.

How it works: A questionnaire sets a risk level, and Marcus invests in a diversified ETF portfolio built by Goldman Sachs, rebalancing automatically. The pitch is the pairing with Marcus high-yield savings so cash and investments sit in one place, rather than any distinctive portfolio approach.

In practice, Marcus Invest’s AI automates a diversified etf portfolio. It falls under hands-off automated investing (robo-advisors), which makes it best suited to goldman-built portfolios alongside a marcus savings account. On connecting an account it is “No (holds your money at Marcus)”, and on execution it is “Automated”. It is priced as percentage of assets (verify current).

One honest limitation: A conventional automated portfolio with no distinguishing feature beyond sitting next to Marcus savings.

The core difference is category. M1 Finance focuses on people who want to choose the holdings but automate the maintenance (automates rebalancing toward weights you set), and Marcus Invest on goldman-built portfolios alongside a marcus savings account (automates a diversified etf portfolio). On broker connection they differ too: M1 Finance is “No (holds your money at M1)” versus Marcus Invest at “No (holds your money at Marcus)”. That shapes everything downstream: how personal the answers are, where trades settle, and how much control you keep over individual positions.

Every tool gives something up for what it does well. Here is the honest give-and-take on each, so you can weigh the specific strengths against the limitations that come with them rather than judging on the headline category alone.

For AI investing tools, the distinction that matters most is whether the tool works from your actual, connected positions or reasons from something else: a separate account it manages for you, or the tickers and numbers you feed it. It decides how personal the answers can be, and where your money physically lives.

• M1 Finance: manages a separate account it holds. M1 Finance does not read the brokerage you already use. It opens and holds a new account, then invests the money you move into it, so its view is limited to what sits inside M1 Finance.
• Marcus Invest: manages a separate account it holds. Marcus Invest does not read the brokerage you already use. It opens and holds a new account, then invests the money you move into it, so its view is limited to what sits inside Marcus Invest.

On this specific question the two land on the same side, so the deciding factors between them are elsewhere: category, cost, and who each is built for. This holdings-aware angle is the one Walnut is built around: it connects the brokerage you already use and reasons from your live positions, read-only by default, with any trades left for you to approve.

There is no universal winner here; the right pick depends on the job you are hiring the tool for. Match the category to your intent rather than chasing a single “best.”

• Choose M1 Finance if you want people who want to choose the holdings but automate the maintenance. Its AI automates rebalancing toward weights you set, it is priced as free tier plus a paid tier (verify current), and it fits hands-off automated investing (robo-advisors). It is built for a self-directed investor with a clear allocation in mind who wants it maintained automatically rather than by hand. Keep in mind that trading happens in scheduled windows rather than on demand, which suits long-term investing and frustrates anyone wanting control over execution.
• Choose Marcus Invest if you want goldman-built portfolios alongside a marcus savings account. Its AI automates a diversified etf portfolio, it is priced as percentage of assets (verify current), and it fits hands-off automated investing (robo-advisors). It is built for an existing Marcus savings customer who wants automated investing in the same place and does not need anything unusual. Keep in mind that a conventional automated portfolio with no distinguishing feature beyond sitting next to marcus savings.

Because both sit in the same category, the choice comes down to the finer details above rather than a fundamental difference in approach.

Cost is easy to misread when two tools charge in different shapes, so compare the model, not just the number. M1 Finance is priced as free tier plus a paid tier (verify current), while Marcus Invest is priced as percentage of assets (verify current). A percentage-of-assets fee scales with your balance, a flat subscription does not, and a “free” tier usually earns elsewhere (on cash, order flow, or premium upgrades), so the cheapest headline is not always the cheapest outcome for your situation.

Pricing and tiers change often. Confirm the current numbers on each provider’s own site before you decide; the framing above is point-in-time.

If neither quite fits, Walnut sits in a third category: chat-driven management of your own brokerage. It connects the brokerage you already use through SnapTrade, lets you analyze and manage it by talking through Claude or ChatGPT, build thematic portfolios around a thesis, and place trades you approve. Read-only by default. See Walnut vs M1 Finance and Walnut vs Marcus Invest. Walnut is not an investment adviser.