Walnut vs Ziggma: Which Is Better in 2026?

Prices checked October 2026. A price marked (Oct 2026) was read on the vendor's own pricing page; others are described without a number because we could not verify one.

The AI that knows your portfolio. Ask anything in plain English, research any stock or fund, and get an honest second opinion, on the broker you already use. Read-only by default, you approve every trade, and it never holds your money. Walnut is not an investment adviser.

How it works: You connect the brokerage you already use, read-only by default, so your login stays with your broker and your money never moves. Walnut gives each holding a keep, trim or exit read from its one-year price return against the S&P 500, its momentum and its size, and flags any position above a quarter of the portfolio. You ask follow-up questions in Walnut's own assistant, or inside Claude or ChatGPT through its connector, which only reads. You can turn a thesis into a basket with target weights, and when you decide to act Walnut drafts the trades and places the ones you approve at Public plus eight other brokers including E*Trade, tastytrade and Webull.

In practice, Walnut’s AI reads your real holdings, rates each one against the S&P 500, builds baskets and drafts trades. It is an AI investing app that connects the brokerage you already use, best suited to a keep, trim or exit read on the stocks you already own, and placing the trades you approve. On connecting an account: yes (the brokerage you already use, read-only by default). On execution: places the trades you approve at Public and eight other brokers. Cost: free; Walnut Plus $9.99/mo on the web; no fee on assets.

One real limitation: It has no cost basis or tax lots, so it reports one-year price returns and cannot show profit and loss, and it is read-only at Schwab, Fidelity and Vanguard.

A portfolio analytics platform with proprietary stock scores, portfolio simulation and dividend tracking for self-directed investors.

How it works: You connect or enter your holdings and Ziggma analyses the portfolio for exposure, risk and dividend income, scoring individual stocks on fundamental factors. A simulator lets you test how adding or removing a position would change the whole portfolio before you do it, which is the feature most portfolio trackers lack.

In practice, Ziggma’s AI scores stocks and analyses portfolio construction. It is an AI stock research and scoring tool, best suited to portfolio analytics and stock scoring for self-directed investors. On connecting an account: yes, for tracking. On execution: no. Cost: free plan; paid $9.99 to $19.99 a month (Oct 2026).

One real limitation: Analysis and simulation only; it cannot place an order, so acting on anything means going back to your broker.

In short, Ziggma is about generating stock ideas, scores, or signals to research, while Walnut is about deciding what to do with the stocks you already own: each one gets a keep, trim or exit read, and Walnut places the trades you approve. Ziggma produces research and signals you then act on somewhere else, whereas Walnut connects your real account so the AI works on your actual holdings.

Every tool gives something up for what it does well. Below is the give-and-take on each, so you can weigh the specific strengths against the limitations that come with them, beyond the headline category.

For AI investing tools, the distinction that matters most is whether the tool works from your actual, connected positions or reasons from something else: a separate account it manages for you, or the tickers and numbers you feed it. It decides how personal the answers can be, and where your money physically lives.

• Walnut: reads your real connected holdings. Walnut connects your real brokerage (Yes (the brokerage you already use, read-only by default)) and works from your actual positions, so its answers reflect what you actually own.
• Ziggma: reads your real connected holdings. Ziggma connects your real brokerage (Yes, for tracking) and works from your actual positions, so its answers reflect what you actually own.

On this specific question the two land on the same side, so the deciding factors between them are elsewhere: category, cost, and who each is built for. This holdings-aware angle is the one Walnut is built around: it connects the brokerage you already use and reasons from your live positions, read-only by default, with any trades left for you to approve.

Each one wins a different job, so the answer depends on which job you need done.

• Choose Walnut if you want a keep, trim or exit read on the stocks you already own, and placing the trades you approve. Its AI reads your real holdings, rates each one against the S&P 500, builds baskets and drafts trades, and it costs free; Walnut Plus $9.99/mo on the web; no fee on assets. It is built for investors who already own stocks at a broker and want an AI investing app to tell them which to keep, trim or exit, without moving their money. Keep in mind: it has no cost basis or tax lots, so it reports one-year price returns and cannot show profit and loss, and it is read-only at Schwab, Fidelity and Vanguard.
• Choose Ziggma if you want portfolio analytics and stock scoring for self-directed investors. Its AI scores stocks and analyses portfolio construction, and it costs free plan; paid $9.99 to $19.99 a month (Oct 2026). It is built for a self-directed long-term investor who wants to understand portfolio-level effects before adding a position. Keep in mind: analysis and simulation only; it cannot place an order, so acting on anything means going back to your broker.

Because they sit in different categories, this is not strictly either-or: some investors use one for a keep, trim or exit read on the stocks you already own, and placing the trades you approve and the other for portfolio analytics and stock scoring for self-directed investors, and watch for overlapping costs.

Cost is easy to misread when two tools charge in different shapes, so compare the model, not just the number. Walnut: free; Walnut Plus $9.99/mo on the web; no fee on assets. Ziggma: free plan; paid $9.99 to $19.99 a month (Oct 2026). A percentage-of-assets fee scales with your balance, a flat subscription does not, and a “free” tier usually earns elsewhere (on cash, order flow, or premium upgrades), so the cheapest headline is not always the cheapest outcome for your situation.

Prices checked October 2026. Pricing and tiers change, so confirm the current numbers on each provider’s own site before you decide.